Join America Back to Work, a weekly podcast, video, and blog series that covers timely and relevant topics affecting the labor market and workforce with industry experts. The series includes recruiting, hiring, retention, employee satisfaction, customer service, background screenings, and more.
The Hidden Legal and Ethical Risks of AI In HR
The hidden risks associated with AI in HR, particularly bias, compliance, and public perception, demand thoughtful strategies and precise action by HR leaders. Its rapid integration into human resources—automating recruitment, onboarding, and performance evaluation processes—has created a new landscape full of opportunity and risk.
John Rood, founder of Perceptual, warns of the increasing dangers of relying on AI tools that often mirror the biases in the datasets on which they are trained.
“We’re seeing AI replicate the biases it was meant to eliminate,” Rood notes.
In many cases, algorithms built into these AI tools reinforce systemic inequalities. For example, AI tools might overvalue certain schools or professional backgrounds, disproportionately favoring candidates from more privileged groups and perpetuating the same disparities that companies aim to eliminate.
The Spread of AI Bias Auditing Laws and Compliance Risks
As AI use grows, so does the regulatory environment designed to keep it in check. New York City’s Local Law 144, a pioneering regulation that mandates bias audits for AI used in hiring, sets a precedent for other states to follow. This law requires companies to publicly post audits that check for racial and gender bias in their AI systems, allowing anyone—job applicants, media, or regulators—to scrutinize the fairness of these tools.
Rood highlights this significance, “New York’s law is not an isolated case; it’s the beginning of a national trend.”
Similar regulations are quickly gaining traction in states like New Jersey and California, which are expected to implement their versions soon. Moreover, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has clarified that algorithmic bias will be a key focus of their regulatory efforts in the coming years.
Failing to comply with these laws can lead to significant fines. In New York, penalties for non-compliance can reach $3,000 per day. These fines can accumulate quickly for smaller or mid-sized companies, putting the business in financial jeopardy.
Beyond the direct monetary costs, companies face reputational damage if public audits reveal biased practices, eroding trust with current and potential employees.
Legal and Ethical Ramifications of AI In HR
Aside from regulatory compliance, AI in HR also raises ethical concerns. The introduction of AI into HR functions—especially hiring—has reshaped the employment landscape, but not without complications. For example, AI that analyzes facial expressions in video interviews can unintentionally disadvantage certain demographics due to lighting or cultural differences.
These challenges hurt the candidate’s experience and expose companies to legal claims under discrimination laws.
The EEOC’s interest in algorithmic hiring further complicates the picture. As more AI-driven hiring tools are adopted, HR leaders must be prepared for increasing legal scrutiny.
The federal government’s involvement means that AI bias is no longer a niche issue confined to certain industries or states. HR teams must proactively understand state and federal requirements to avoid penalties, lawsuits, or public relations disasters.
Building Trust In AI-Powered HR Processes
Public trust is another vital issue regarding AI in HR. Job seekers may feel uncomfortable knowing AI tools are screening their resumes or evaluating their interview performance. This discomfort is amplified when AI tools seem opaque or overly reliant on algorithms without adequate human intervention.
Rood points out that transparency is key to building trust, “When candidates find out an AI tool screened them out unfairly, it damages their perception of the company.”
To combat this, companies must take active steps to explain how AI tools are used and what safeguards are in place to prevent bias. Detailed explanations of the AI’s role in hiring can reassure candidates that they are being evaluated fairly.
Being upfront about AI’s limitations is equally important. Candidates who feel an algorithm unfairly dismissed them are more likely to turn to social media, creating a reputational crisis for the company.
To mitigate this, organizations should allow candidates to appeal decisions made by AI and ensure human oversight is part of the process.
How Companies Can Protect Themselves
Given the risks associated with AI in HR, companies must implement a comprehensive AI governance framework to ensure compliance and ethical use of these tools. One of the most effective ways to reduce bias is to conduct regular third-party audits on all AI systems used within the company. These audits should assess the fairness and accuracy of AI outputs and check for any disparities across different demographic groups.
Additionally, HR teams must ensure that human oversight is maintained throughout the AI-powered hiring process. While AI can quickly sift through applications or suggest the best candidates, final decisions should involve a human reviewer who can account for the context an AI may miss.
Collaboration across departments is critical for building a strong AI governance framework. HR leaders need to work closely with legal, IT, and compliance teams to navigate the complexities of new regulations. Regularly reviewing legal updates and keeping abreast of the latest AI technologies will help companies comply with current and future laws.
Best Practices for HR Leaders
The rapid adoption of AI in HR requires a new approach to governance and compliance. HR leaders must implement an AI safety program that adheres to the highest fairness, transparency, and accountability standards.
Key strategies include:
- Auditing AI systems regularly: Conduct regular third-party audits to assess and correct bias.
- Maintaining human oversight: Ensure human reviewers remain involved in AI-driven hiring decisions.
- Collaborating across departments: Work closely with legal, IT, and compliance teams to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape.
- Training employees: Educate HR professionals and candidates on how AI is used and how to address any concerns.
- Staying informed: Continuously monitor new developments in AI legislation to ensure compliance.
The Future of AI in HR
As AI technology becomes more ingrained in HR, the pressure on companies to ensure its ethical use will only grow. HR leaders must navigate a complex regulatory environment, address public concerns, and manage the inherent risks of AI while maintaining the efficiency and benefits these tools offer. The future of HR and AI is intertwined, but companies face legal, financial, and reputational consequences without proactive measures.
Rood’s advice is clear, “AI can be a game-changer for HR, but only if we use it responsibly. We need to embrace innovation without losing sight of our ethical responsibilities.”
By adhering to best practices and prioritizing fairness and compliance, HR professionals can create a future where AI serves the company’s goals and the needs of its workforce.