Join America Back to Work, a weekly podcast, video, and blog series that covers timely and relevant topics affecting the labor market and workforce with industry experts. The series includes recruiting, hiring, retention, employee satisfaction, customer service, background screenings, and more.
How State Privacy Laws Affect Your Background Screening
Background screening is essential for many businesses, particularly those operating in sectors where trust and security are paramount. However, the challenges of conducting thorough and compliant background checks can vary significantly from state to state, with Michigan and California presenting particularly unique hurdles. The two states have enacted laws and policies prioritizing individual privacy and fairness in hiring practices, which affects how companies can access and use criminal records and other personal data during hiring.
In Michigan, the legal framework around background checks has not reached the restrictiveness seen in California. Still, trends suggest a shift towards increasing privacy protections, which may complicate the screening process in the near future.
On the other hand, California has established itself as a leader in employee privacy rights, with several laws that tightly regulate the use of personal information. For instance, the California Fair Chance Act restricts employers from inquiring about criminal history until a conditional job offer has been made. It aims to give all candidates a fair shot at employment regardless of their past.
Understanding and adapting to regulations is critical for companies navigating these legal landscapes. This means staying updated on legislative changes, leveraging various background checks, and working with knowledgeable screening providers to ensure compliance.
Michigan’s Background Screening Limitations
Michigan has not enacted laws as restrictive as those in California. Still, the general trend in privacy laws nationally is toward more restrictions on employer access to criminal records, which can complicate the screening process.
They have implemented several “clean slate” laws that affect how criminal records can be accessed and used. These laws include the automatic expungement of certain criminal records, which may limit the availability of such records for background checks. The state aims to make criminal records less of a barrier to employment for individuals with past criminal justice involvement.
Like many other states, Michigan is emphasizing fairness in employment, which might eventually lead to tighter regulations similar to California’s.
California’s Complex Legal Landscape
In California, several laws and judicial decisions have created a unique and challenging environment for conducting background checks:
- Ban the Box Laws and Fair Chance Act prohibit employers from inquiring about an applicant’s criminal history until a conditional job offer has been made. This law is designed to allow candidates to be evaluated on their qualifications first, without the stigma of a criminal record.
- SB-731: This law automatically seals certain felony records, making it difficult for employers and screening agencies to access relevant criminal history. The law applies to non-violent, non-sex offender-related felonies under specific conditions, limiting the available data for background checks.
- Restrictions on Credit Checks: California restricts the use of credit history in employment decisions except for certain financial positions, adding another layer of complexity to the screening process.
- Redaction of Personal Identifiers: A significant court decision mandated the redaction of birth dates and driver’s license numbers from court records, which complicates the verification process for criminal records since these identifiers are crucial for ensuring accuracy.
These regulations are designed to protect job applicants from discrimination based on their criminal history. This includes rules against inquiring about arrest records that did not lead to a conviction and other specific limitations on the reporting and use of criminal history
Background Screening Strategies for MI and CA
For those hiring in Michigan and California, it’s crucial to adapt to these legal constraints by implementing best practices that comply with local laws while still striving to maintain thorough background checks:
- Stay updated on the latest regulations and court decisions affecting background screening and adjust your HR policies accordingly.
- Because criminal records may be limited, consider using multiple background checks, including education verification, employment history, and professional references, to comprehensively view a candidate.
- Work with background check providers who are well-versed in each state’s specific laws and can effectively navigate the complexities of local regulations.
- Obtain clear consent from candidates before conducting background checks and be transparent about the process, which can help mitigate potential legal issues.
Keep Updated and Stay Compliant
By understanding and navigating these legal landscapes, HR professionals can still effectively screen potential employees, ensuring compliance with the law and the safety and integrity of their workforce.
As the gig economy grows and the workforce becomes more mobile, the complexity of conducting background checks will only increase, underscoring the need for robust, informed strategies that balance legal requirements with thorough vetting.
S2Verify does not provide legal advice; this article is only intended for educational purposes.